3 ms·
qed!
by nautilius 5y ago
qed!
- xadhominemx 5y agoNo, your scenario is different than the headline. Closer, but still not the same, would be “xadhominemx posts in this thread”
- nautilius 5y agoIt seems you missed the whole 'a single observation proves a theorem' part in the headline, which you conveniently omit in your attempt here.
- xadhominemx 5y agoThere was not a single observation. The star followed a complex trajectory.