3 ms·
> It seems like the military wants to expand it to where mere non-participation is not sufficient to be free of it. I noticed this about a major U.S. news prog
by r3trohack3r 5y ago
> It seems like the military wants to expand it to where mere non-participation is not sufficient to be free of it.
I noticed this about a major U.S. news program in the 2000s. Their format was to get 6-8 people on screen with a “diverse set of viewpoints” to debate. Whether intentional or not, what they were doing was debate training. The anchor hinted at the message they wanted you to promote before the debate started, usually the “right” message started first, and the “diverse viewpoints” were there to introduce you to common retorts you’ll encounter and how you can defend against them.
They were training you to go out and spread their message in your social circles. I thought it was absolutely brilliant, they figured out how to use their news program to reach folks who didn’t watch their news program. Though I was a bit frustrated since I didn’t agree with their message!
- motohagiography 5y agoToday I would say they were called "talking points." Do you want ideas that align you to power, or ones that isolate you from it? Watching real news from reliable mainstream sources lets you digest experiences, realign your beliefs, and separate anything that isolates you from pro-social participation. Imo, news and commentary today are just over-the-air updates for official narratives. They are argument feature packs, same as anti-virus signature updates but for ideas.