4 ms·
This should be titled "The present state of Lisp", or better yet, "A review of current Lisp-like languages". Compare this with the classic "Good news, bad news"
by syntaxfree 15y ago
This should be titled "The present state of Lisp", or better yet, "A review of current Lisp-like languages". Compare this with the classic "Good news, bad news", which wasn't about implementations, but about the more general societal dynamics (within the developer community) by which Lisp thrives or stalls.
- msbarnett 15y ago> This should be titled "The present state of Lisp", or better yet, "A review of current Lisp-like languages". "A review of my misunderstandings of, and obvious lack of experience with, current Lisp-like languages" would perhaps be even more accurate.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]