Warrants follow requests to compel sharing of information known to exist. So, DDG very well may have been served requests for available information on a given

Warrants follow requests to compel sharing of information known to exist. So, DDG very well may have been served requests for available information on a given user or IP, its just that the information the company had was not enough for LEOs to request a warrant. It's still impressive, but it would be interesting to know if LEOs continue to ask, (as in, "has anything changed on your end where now we can get this stuff?") or if LEOs know DDG is a dead end and are no longer even making information requests.