2 ms·
To be clear, I'm not saying that the FSF has written a poor license. It's a fine license for many libraries, especially at the time it was written. I'm saying
by dralley 5y ago
To be clear, I'm not saying that the FSF has written a poor license. It's a fine license for many libraries, especially at the time it was written.
I'm saying it's a poor choice for a brand new library written in a language where the vast majority of the ecosystem utilizes static linking.
- cormacrelf 5y agoThere’s a case to be made that Sequoia or another LGPL user should also invest in making it easier to comply with the LGPL with Rust tooling. But I doubt that will happen anytime soon.