3 ms·
I feel like inkjet printers have some of the most anti-consumer practices aside from maybe payday loans. It almost feels like lawyers don't want to do anything
by genmud 5y ago
I feel like inkjet printers have some of the most anti-consumer practices aside from maybe payday loans.
It almost feels like lawyers don't want to do anything related to technology and ones that do have had some spectacular failures, setting really bad precedent.
- munk-a 5y agoAlthough I would mention that I'd expect the litigious class to be some of the most highly impacted by the bizarre pricing practices of printers. Physical copies of legal documents are still often used for review and agreement even if those documents include 150 pages of boilerplate term definitions.
- kfprt 5y agoLawyers are smart enough not to trust computers.
- uselesscynicism 5y agoLegal documents printed by law firms are printed in black and white with laser printers, so the litigious class is shielded from the predatory practices that consumers put up with when buying color inkjet printers
- gruez 5y agoDo lawyers that print off dozens of sheets per day even use inkjet printers? Most of the scummy behavior revolve around inkjet printers, and I bet most would have switched to laser because of its cost-effectiveness. This seems to be confirmed in my limited sample of office printers. I've yet seen an office that used an inkjet printer.