A legal precedent was set by González v. Abercrombie & Fitch. Being seen on the wrong side of the diversity issue becomes a legal liability that everybody avoid

A legal precedent was set by González v. Abercrombie & Fitch. Being seen on the wrong side of the diversity issue becomes a legal liability that everybody avoids. Issues that everybody avoids morph into cultural dogma via groupthink. The role of Twitter mobs is to buildup and maintain pressure, which, at the very least, raises the concrete risk of legal damages. See, for example, the recent Tesla $137M discrimination verdict. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abercrombie_%26_Fitch#Employment_practices https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abercrombie_%26_Fitch#Employme... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._Abercrombie_%26_Fitch_Stores,_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._Abercrombie_%26_Fi....