Then perhaps you should be writing the article, not Robert Frank. As written, the article is worthless except as a way to generate uninformed outrage. If you h

Then perhaps you should be writing the article, not Robert Frank. As written, the article is worthless except as a way to generate uninformed outrage. If you have information to share, I have an open mind. I suspect it will be less outragous than the 10%/89% headline, though.