3 ms·
It's not just "not perfect", it's extremely flawed. You didn't "go on" at all about its flaws or failures at measuring merit, and only provided a toy example of
by Klinky 5y ago
It's not just "not perfect", it's extremely flawed. You didn't "go on" at all about its flaws or failures at measuring merit, and only provided a toy example of a superfluous mega-rich celebrity deserving his wealth while ignoring Hollywood's underhanded exploitation and accounting issues.
- TameAntelope 5y agoBecause something is "not perfect" or "extremely flawed" doesn't mean there is a better thing out there. Something can be "extremely flawed" and also be the best option available, such as in this case.
- sudosysgen 5y agoYou have to make a case for it that isn't circular first. The idea that there should not be any democratic input on the economy seems quite unsupported so far.
- laserlight 5y agoHow do you know there’s no better alternative out there? I don’t see anyone trying to find one.