3 ms·
A single-core Atom will still beat these in single threaded performance. Multi-threaded performance is a different story, but I would still not expect an outrig
by codedivine 15y ago
A single-core Atom will still beat these in single threaded performance. Multi-threaded performance is a different story, but I would still not expect an outright win for these Snapdragons. However, Adreno 220 is clearly superior to the GMA 950 crap bundled with most Atoms.
- ck2 15y agoI wouldn't be too sure of that. And these were BEFORE a 1.5ghz ARM chip. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pEfSMUbljUA/S9yFTQn2xoI/AAAAAAAAAD8/P2r0WkVYhZI/s1600/Benchmark_ipad_iphone_atom_arm_cortex_apple_a4_nvidia.JPG http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pEfSMUbljUA/S9yFTQn2xoI/AAAAAAAAAD... http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_pEfSMUbljUA/TIJceUBPyCI/AAAAAAAAAEU/hvvbfuIRaxA/s1600/Cortex_vs_ARM11_vs_Atom_Coremark_Benchmarks.JPG http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_pEfSMUbljUA/TIJceUBPyCI/AAAAAAAAAE...
- codedivine 15y agoCoremark isn't a good benchmark. I have been benchmarking Snapdragons and Atoms myself on a variety of integer and floating point codes. I will publish them sometime soon but Atom-based netbooks came ahead of the Snapdragon based systems I had access to. I suspect this is partially because you have more memory bandwidth available in netbooks compared to mobile devices. edit: Also, I do expect results to change quite a bit when the Krait architecture comes into play for Qualcomm.
- ck2 15y agoAh interesting - I look forward to your benchmarks!