Odd that this article suggests that Intel ignored a new technology until it was too late in the Apple case, when the article that they link to back that claim a

Odd that this article suggests that Intel ignored a new technology until it was too late in the Apple case, when the article that they link to back that claim argues for the other style of disruption---low-end product eventually claws up market share and performance to compete with the high-end. The rest of the article seems reasonable, but IMHO and many other's opinions is that the Intel/Apple/ARM thing is classic disruption from the low end.