>Wow so there was an ivermectin study with 44k people? Where is it? Perhaps I should have spoken more precisely, but I don't get the impression you're trying t

>Wow so there was an ivermectin study with 44k people? Where is it? Perhaps I should have spoken more precisely, but I don't get the impression you're trying to seriously consider whether ivermectin is useful. https://ivmmeta.com/ https://ivmmeta.com/ Preemptively, if you're interested in picking apart why one RCT can't be compared in any way to a collection of studies, only some of which are RCTs, I'm not. > But what's going on is that people are looking for an ALTERNATIVE to the vaccine *some people You're effectively strawmanning, and choosing not to engage with the actual doctors who don't advocate this. Which is practically all of the ones I can find. But by all means, please link me all of the doctors stating we should use ivermectin as an alternative. I'll bet I can link a lot more that aren't. The website I linked above even explicitly states this in bold, on the front page. >which is detrimental when the vaccine is proven to be our best tactic against death/serious illness. The trial you're citing seems to indicate there was no observed effect on mortality.