> Oh they absolutely do if people buying their shares, their services, employing them, or writing legislation, or just general public attitudes are influenced b

> Oh they absolutely do if people buying their shares, their services, employing them, or writing legislation, or just general public attitudes are influenced by this data. None of this matters if they don't show product development. They have a market to serve and profitability to think of. There's only so much PR you gain out of artificially reducing disengagement rate. You can't seriously believe this is a real strategy employed by a dozen SDCs. > I don't think this is really a matter of transparency given all the problems with the data and tests we've just identified. When the products and are made available to the public that would be a different matter. Even if you think self reporting data is a problem, the solution is not to encourage companies like Tesla to continue to be opaque and not comply with rules. Since Tesla FSD is already in the public's hands (with more weekly rollouts planned), it is indeed a matter of transparency.