There are some flaws in the argument: .NET has today more funding in Microsoft than ever (this is a gut feeling from seeing the things they move). The argumen

There are some flaws in the argument: .NET has today more funding in Microsoft than ever (this is a gut feeling from seeing the things they move). The argument Project being part of the foundation equals de-facto is not correct. I think there is zero evidence for that. It is however often the other way around, that successful projects fold into the foundation because of it being the de facto foundation and no other foundation has strong ties to .NET