Correct. What I was trying to get across in my earlier reply is that a URL isn't quite treated the same as their name would imply these days. I could see why th

Correct. What I was trying to get across in my earlier reply is that a URL isn't quite treated the same as their name would imply these days. I could see why that might annoy purists, but these days there are browser APIs that enable modifying URLs (which modifies the "back" history) through Javascript, without actually doing a full reload of resources. So even though you're requesting a different address, you're technically not getting an entirely new "resource." No matter where you hit the address, you'll get the same base blob of HTML/css/js, but going to the URL directly will fire the proper navigation (through js) to get you to the spot you requested (which may involve loading different resources, dynamically). Hopefully that explanation makes sense