3 ms·
Hah, we both came to the same conclusion at the same time. Regarding list, it sounds like it might actually keep working atomically without the GIL: > A lot o
by Thorrez 5y ago
Hah, we both came to the same conclusion at the same time.
Regarding list, it sounds like it might actually keep working atomically without the GIL:
> A lot of work has gone into the list and dict implementations to make them thread-safe. And so on.
- fulafel 5y agoYep. So in a final answer to the original question of backwards bug-compatibility (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28897534 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28897534), it seems that it will be retained under the current proposal.