3 ms·
if you can’t see the slant from just the headlines you posted, $deity help you. the times is not even close to being a neutral source on iran and most topics.
by clairity 5y ago
if you can’t see the slant from just the headlines you posted, $deity help you. the times is not even close to being a neutral source on iran and most topics.
- BugsJustFindMe 5y ago> the times is not even close to being a neutral source on iran and most topics. Is the WSJ Opinion section?
- rsj_hn 5y agoNope. There does not exist any newspaper that is even pretending to be unbiased. All you can do is sample news from a variety of different sources -- I've found foreign news is often the best coverage of US events, and in general to be much more professional. There is the famous line by Ben Rhodes: "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That’s a sea change. They literally know nothing." The quality of US news rooms has really collapsed, as they were hit hard by the internet and especially craigslist, whereas some foreign sources have maintained their staff and have higher professional standards. French news is pretty good, IME. I also follow news in eastern europe.