This sounds like it tries to establish the notion of global respectability (see https://web.archive.org/web/20170628190710/http://www.advogato.org/article/928.h

This sounds like it tries to establish the notion of global respectability (see https://web.archive.org/web/20170628190710/http://www.advogato.org/article/928.html https://web.archive.org/web/20170628190710/http://www.advoga...). It’s something that I consider futile — part of the huge failure of clearnet moderation: To moderate billions of people, you have to give up on the notion of a global notion of who is always right. It might be possible to establish for a given not heavily contested fact whether it is correct, but not to establish for a given person whether they are a crank. Just ask people around the world about the POTUS. Freenet replaces that by personal trust. The only remainder of a global trust is initial visibility via seed-IDs. And that is transparent and can be revoked by every user.