4 ms·
IMO it seems like you're trying to do too much at once. If these are just random throw away projects, that's fine. But if you're actually trying to create usef
by dinkleberg 5y ago
IMO it seems like you're trying to do too much at once. If these are just random throw away projects, that's fine.
But if you're actually trying to create useful services, creating a bunch of half-baked services and moving onto the next one is a recipe to make nobody happy.
Some (hopefully) constructive feedback:
* The site is not doing you any favors in representing your web-design agency. Personally I'm not a fan of the aesthetic, but that's neither here nor there. The big issue is the usability of the site. I'd spend some time learning and practicing proper UX.
* There doesn't seem to be any mention of what the "Ortingo Plans" are for. What is this storage for?
* The marketing offer is a) suspect and b) underwhelming. "Virtually guaranteeing" a view count makes me think of those old sketchy "traffic blaster" sites. And 750 views over 30 days is basically nothing, especially for $500 when those views are completely untargeted. Views themselves are worthless. The reason people pay for views (via ads) is to get some percentage of those viewers to convert into buyers.
* I think enough has been said on this thread about the search results so I don't need to add anything there. But the UX is not good on the search results. I'd look up Jakob's law if you aren't familiar with it.