3 ms·
Sure there is. You can use common crawl[0] to start with. You don't need to be the 'next Google', you just need to give relevant results and that's a completely
by new_guy 5y ago
Sure there is. You can use common crawl[0] to start with. You don't need to be the 'next Google', you just need to give relevant results and that's a completely solved issue at this point.
[0]https://commoncrawl.org https://commoncrawl.org
- moffkalast 5y agoEh, there's a difference between giving okay results and the ones you need in every possible case. Kind of how it's easy to make a robot that works 80% of the time for some task but the 99.999% of the time is the challenging bit. Which effectively means you have to go open google when the thing won't give you what you need after a few failed searches and some wasted time. Like Yahoo and Bing may be alright, with their aggregators like DDG giving even slightly better results, but it still falls short of the big G. You can be good, but you will never be better.