The analogy is just plain wrong. search for content = it presumes that there's a google-like indexing of content, and then a DNS-like way to retrieve it. It s

The analogy is just plain wrong. search for content = it presumes that there's a google-like indexing of content, and then a DNS-like way to retrieve it. It seems to me that IPFS, in this analogy, is simply a different way to address a web page / document. note: I am very familiar with IPFS. I just think that this analogy is really poor.