3 ms·
> Describing Anonymous as a "looser collective" seems somewhat unnecessary. Did you misread that as "loser", as in someone who loses? "Loose" is the opposite o
by smolder 5y ago
> Describing Anonymous as a "looser collective" seems somewhat unnecessary.
Did you misread that as "loser", as in someone who loses? "Loose" is the opposite of tight. They just meant it's not as organized or formal as lulzsec, I think.
- enuit 5y agoYes, I did :D Also, I wasn't aware of the spelling difference between loser and looser... Well, now I have learned something from this article