2 ms·
> Chernobyl and Fukushima are uninhabitable, People choose not to live there, but plenty of wildlife does. Which is different from saying it's uninhabitable.
by goatlover 5y ago
> Chernobyl and Fukushima are uninhabitable,
People choose not to live there, but plenty of wildlife does. Which is different from saying it's uninhabitable. People could live there. People haven't because an increased risk for cancer and birth defects. Which is a far cry from saying it's not livable. Chernobyl is basically a wild life sanctuary now. Nature is doing better off because of the lack of human presence.
- chiefalchemist 5y ago> plenty of wildlife does Yup. And the same can we said for the planet. Mother Nature will adjust and bounce back. Ultimately, she's not at risk. We are. So if it's about wildlife, CC is not a fatal issue. Again, MN will persist, one way or another. CC and Humans? That's a differnt plot arc.