3 ms·

Actual work is left as an exercise for the reader ;-)

• lazide 5y ago
  Last I did this, when the processes were fork()‘s of the parent (the typical way this was done), memory overhead was minimal compared to threads. A couple %. That was somewhat workload dependent however, if there is a lot of memory churn or data marshaling/unmarshalling happening as part of the workload, they’ll quickly diverge and you’ll burn a ton of CPU doing so. Typical ways around that include mmap’ng things or various types of shared memory IPC, but that is a lot of work.