3 ms·
I've thought about this in the past and figured something geometric could better capture engagement -1 -> dislike, +1 -> like, +2 -> favourite, +4 -> heart
by HighlandSpring 5y ago
I've thought about this in the past and figured something geometric could better capture engagement
-1 -> dislike,
+1 -> like,
+2 -> favourite,
+4 -> heart
Labels are arbitrary. How might this weighting affect learning?
- pixl97 5y agoThere is something I've never seen in a voting system before, but I'd love for it to take off. Slice open an orange along its equator. Looking at this slice you have a shape kind of like an * Each of these wedges can have a different tag. Those wedges facing up would have a positive value, and down a negative. The site the orange slice voting system is used on can easily decide the number of wedges that make sense and the tags associated. Instead we get binary or unitary choices that don't really mean much. Edit: Image for example https://i.imgur.com/0uVQl3s.jpg https://i.imgur.com/0uVQl3s.jpg