3 ms·
it’s very sad. on a somewhat related topic, i think some media tech firms are violating this law https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payola https://en.m.wikipedia.
by 8eye 5y ago
it’s very sad. on a somewhat related topic, i think some media tech firms are violating this law
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payola https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payola
but indirectly
when an algorithm censors one form of content over another, then it is indirectly supporting the alternative. which is tuned based on biases, those biases pad the pockets of like minded people within their social sphere, their circle of influence.
but the perception is there that this is what everyone wants, so a percentage of people (competition in many cases) gets censored.
if this was like a small corner bar and someone was advertising their business inside someone else’s bar, then yeah i get it, your house, your rules, but censoring someone on a platform that is larger than many nations put together seems dangerous.
- rmbyrro 5y agoBut they're not being paid to do so, like this Law establishes. Unless they're doing it to bbenefit content that are more likely to generate ad revenue. But they already have the freedom to do so with their algos...