3 ms·
"What would the incentive be for a mean, or even underperforming, worker to look at the pay of a top performer and do anything other than argue for more pay for
by spaetzleesser 5y ago
"What would the incentive be for a mean, or even underperforming, worker to look at the pay of a top performer and do anything other than argue for more pay for the same amount of work? "
He can argue for more money and management then has to justify why there is a difference. That's not different from some people being promoted (and paid better) faster than others.
- pverghese 5y agoAnd why would the top performer want just pay to get public and get a target on his or her back
- hnbad 5y agoBecause the top performer most likely doesn't make the most money. They might also have a better negotiating position if other companies are pressured to do the same and reveal they pay better for a similar performance. All of this is somewhat of a moot argument though as individuals hold very little bargaining power in the general work force. You might have some leverage when applying for a C-level position (but let's be honest, you don't go through a regular hiring process for positions like that) but if you want anything that's a significantly deviation from what the company will happily give you, you'll get nowhere without collective bargaining (and in fact you will more likely just get replaced). Individual workers don't hold much power, even if they're made to feel like celebrity athletes with foosball tables, fruit bowls and free drinks on tap.
- spaetzleesser 5y agoMosr people who think they are top performers and paid accordingly really aren’t paid better than others. They are just lied to by their managers.
- Frondo 5y agoThe top performer is not necessarily (and, in my experience, is seldom) the best negotiator.