> The last sentence nails on the head why pure democracy doesn't work. Nothing gets done. Pure democracy is a meeting with more than 12 people in it. I keep re

> The last sentence nails on the head why pure democracy doesn't work. Nothing gets done. Pure democracy is a meeting with more than 12 people in it. I keep reading this but can't square it with what the last sentence seemed to say. I'm pretty sure they were arguing the opposite of what you took that sentence to mean, or am I missing something obvious?