4 ms·
I am also sorry for GPs loss. I would point out, though, that in an organization of that size, the people making personnel decisions are likely several degrees
by 13of40 5y ago
I am also sorry for GPs loss. I would point out, though, that in an organization of that size, the people making personnel decisions are likely several degrees removed from the people making product and customer support decisions. Kind of like how I love my Amazon Prime, but I get a little knot in my stomach when I hear about the lives of their fulfillment people.
- fakedang 5y agoThat's just your rationalization of a company's bad practices. A company can provide great service and great benefits to its employees, at the cost of a single factor - its bottomline.
- TomSwirly 5y ago> that in an organization of that size, the people making personnel decisions are likely several degrees removed from the people making product and customer support decisions. This is morally and ethically wrong. If you run a company it is _your responsibility_ if your employees are mistreated. More, why exactly is this happening? Do you think the lower-downs make policy like this about healthcare? No. They are given unrealistic financial targets by management and can choose either to leave, or to grind the workers for every spare penny. --- The people who run these companies take the lions' shares of the profits and yet when their companies deliberately do something horrible, they shrug and say, "Not my fault." It's simply evil.