4 ms·
The article doesn’t state that it will be published. It states that the registrar must have it. The Pirate Party member, as mentioned in the article, didn’t rea
by lunatuna 5y ago
The article doesn’t state that it will be published. It states that the registrar must have it. The Pirate Party member, as mentioned in the article, didn’t read the proposal.
- nerdponx 5y agoThat's one subpoena or warrant away from it being published to people who you don't want to have it.
- ALittleLight 5y agoOr hack, misconfiguration, data leak, insider, etc.
- wmf 5y agoLike real estate and vehicles, domain registrations probably shouldn't be too private by default.
- PeterisP 5y agoThat's a bit separate from the notion of privacy - warantless searches violate privacy, but there is (nor should be) any expectation of privacy given a valid warrant; valid warrants is the scenario where we the people have decided (and written in our laws and constitutions) that you should not be able to keep things hidden.