4 ms·
> Edit: Actually, I see my confusion, you accidentally printed 'f', not 'g', which I think was your intent? I am not quite sure what you mean? There was no 'g
by moonchild 5y ago
> Edit: Actually, I see my confusion, you accidentally printed 'f', not 'g', which I think was your intent?
I am not quite sure what you mean? There was no 'g' at all in my code snippet except for that in 'object->string'. Unless you are mistaking the '9' for one?
- taeric 5y agoIs what happens when I write so late at night. I mistook the 9 for a g, thinking it was showing the body of the lambda. Really, I was just reading it all sorts of wrong. I still feel this is somehow different, but I can't express the difference well. Note that I should say I am not at all surprised that scheme could do this, for what its worth. I'm just saying that this feels different.