Efficient threading is always like that anyway? You have to push the parallization a bit up in level. By the way, concurrent.futures in Python provides identic

Efficient threading is always like that anyway? You have to push the parallization a bit up in level. By the way, concurrent.futures in Python provides identical (almost) features for a process and thread pool executor, so either choice there can be handled the same way. I'm most fond of the executor.map() method for very easy parallelization of work-loops.