3 ms·
> the actual elite The class position of the 0.1% (Vanderbilt heirs, Mars heirs, Koch heirs etc.) matters, but they themselves don't matter much. The bulk of
by VictorPath 5y ago
> the actual elite
The class position of the 0.1% (Vanderbilt heirs, Mars heirs, Koch heirs etc.) matters, but they themselves don't matter much. The bulk of the population are unskilled or semi-skilled labor, and ~10% of the population are in the professional-managerial class.
The efforts and ideology of a highly trained, highly educated, somewhat meritocraticaly placed vanguard matters, they are an existing social force, whereas the 0.1% is totally dependent on others for their position.
- nobodyandproud 5y agoIt’s the 0.1% that drives the vast majority of the white collar profession.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoEither evidence or argument would make your post more convincing. "It's so" doesn't move the needle in many minds.
- seattle_spring 5y agoWhy did you add this comment to parent instead of GP, which started this whole thing with a similarly unsourced claim?
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoWell... I give the first person a bit more slack in that situation. Stating a claim can be interesting, even with no substantiation. (It isn't always, but it can be.) But a rebuttal that just says "no, it's not" is, in my view, considerably less useful or interesting or whatever. I expect more from a rebuttal than I do from a statement of an initial position - partly because not all statements of an initial position will get a rebuttal, but every rebuttal is in reply to a stated position. Maybe that's just me...