4 ms·
> Impose a huge pollution tax on any oil/crude removed from the ground. 30$/barrel, increasing by 10$ per year until we get to 100$/barrel. Extracting the oil
by kaashif 5y ago
> Impose a huge pollution tax on any oil/crude removed from the ground. 30$/barrel, increasing by 10$ per year until we get to 100$/barrel.
Extracting the oil from the ground doesn't cause greenhouse gas emissions in and of itself - burning fuel does. We should tax carbon emissions. We should tax oil extraction too, but that wouldn't be a pollution tax.
> Modern economics, be it the theory, the people practicing it, the political structures that influence policy, is a massive failure because of itss utter inability to not just consider 5 or 10 or 20 years into the future.
Economists overwhelmingly support a carbon tax. It is politically difficult to get done in the US, but the climate scientists and economists are united on this front - pollution is an externality that laissez-faire libertarianism can't deal with, and we need a carbon tax to price it in.
A carbon tax which is redistributed evenly wouldn't be regressive either, and Austria is even implementing such a system.
- blacksmith_tb 5y agoExtraction does have its own emissions (those drilling rigs don't run on water...), especially from flaring natural gas. Not to mention oil is heavy, so transportation also figures in significantly.
- missedthecue 5y agoPetroleum is generally transported using pipelines which are very efficient. Moreover, the centrifugal pumps used are powered by electricity.