4 ms·

> Vienna’s tourism board has started an account on OnlyFans – the only social network that permits depictions of nudity – in protest against platforms’ ongoing

by rapnie 5y ago

> Vienna’s tourism board has started an account on OnlyFans – the only social network that permits depictions of nudity – in protest against platforms’ ongoing censorship of its art museums and galleries. The only social network? How about the Fediverse? Spin up their own PixelFed (and a Mastodon instance too), promote it widely, and donate some of their public money to these FOSS projects based on open standards, instead of just choosing a proprietary centralized platform.

jstx1 5y ago
Fediverse is a niche thing for people who care more about decentralisation for the sake of decentralisation rather than the actual social media aspect.
- elsjaako 5y ago
  I'm on mastodon because it's a nice social network. It doesn't even need to grow, it's fine as-is.
- kradeelav 5y ago
  Not in my experience, personally. There's a fair few artists who have art accounts on mastodon.socal and the related mastodon servers - especially handy for NSFW artists of all stripes. two examples: https://mastodon.social/@kradeelav https://mastodon.social/@kradeelav https://mastodon.social/@chirart https://mastodon.social/@chirart
- rapnie 5y ago
  I don't know where you get this notion. Fediverse is small with only about 4 million accounts spread out on a couple 1,000 instances. Social aspects are taken very seriously though, and have created a unique atmosphere and culture. Netiquette is taken seriously, and devs take care to avoid building social features that are harmful.
- teorema 5y ago
  I can remember when a lot of widespread network platforms were niche. Twitter and post Twitter started this VC instant popularity expectation. I don't mean to advocate for Mastodon or anything else in particular, but these things sometimes have a way of being niche until they're not. I also think part of the parent's argument was that in encountering obstacles like this, groups of nonprofit institutions such as art museums could leverage their position to promote decentralized systems, rather than simply throw up their hands and go with a sensationalized move. Then again we are here discussing it. But then again if they banded together to post on some decentralized platform we'd probably be talking too.
- quadrifoliate 5y ago
  The Internet was once a niche thing for people who cared about decentralisation and interoperability. Otherwise we would be in "I can't get to HN, it's on the AT&T network" or "Only $5 more to upgrade to the Tech Websites Package!" territory today. There's no reason social media shouldn't be more decentralized and federated. European institutes can and should consider open source, federated alternatives unless they want to be forced to play by the rules of the big social media providers.
makeworld 5y ago
What about Twitter?
niij 5y ago
I interpreted it as "the only social network that people actually use".
_fat_santa 5y ago
I think the decision to put it up on OF was pretty deliberate. A story about a museum opening an OnlyFans account is going to get alot more people talking than if the museum did it with the Fediverse or some other implementation.

by rapnie 5y ago

jstx1 5y ago

Fediverse is a niche thing for people who care more about decentralisation for the sake of decentralisation rather than the actual social media aspect.

elsjaako 5y ago
I'm on mastodon because it's a nice social network. It doesn't even need to grow, it's fine as-is.
kradeelav 5y ago
Not in my experience, personally. There's a fair few artists who have art accounts on mastodon.socal and the related mastodon servers - especially handy for NSFW artists of all stripes. two examples: https://mastodon.social/@kradeelav https://mastodon.social/@kradeelav https://mastodon.social/@chirart https://mastodon.social/@chirart
rapnie 5y ago
I don't know where you get this notion. Fediverse is small with only about 4 million accounts spread out on a couple 1,000 instances. Social aspects are taken very seriously though, and have created a unique atmosphere and culture. Netiquette is taken seriously, and devs take care to avoid building social features that are harmful.
teorema 5y ago
I can remember when a lot of widespread network platforms were niche. Twitter and post Twitter started this VC instant popularity expectation. I don't mean to advocate for Mastodon or anything else in particular, but these things sometimes have a way of being niche until they're not. I also think part of the parent's argument was that in encountering obstacles like this, groups of nonprofit institutions such as art museums could leverage their position to promote decentralized systems, rather than simply throw up their hands and go with a sensationalized move. Then again we are here discussing it. But then again if they banded together to post on some decentralized platform we'd probably be talking too.
quadrifoliate 5y ago
The Internet was once a niche thing for people who cared about decentralisation and interoperability. Otherwise we would be in "I can't get to HN, it's on the AT&T network" or "Only $5 more to upgrade to the Tech Websites Package!" territory today. There's no reason social media shouldn't be more decentralized and federated. European institutes can and should consider open source, federated alternatives unless they want to be forced to play by the rules of the big social media providers.

makeworld 5y ago

What about Twitter?

niij 5y ago

I interpreted it as "the only social network that people actually use".

_fat_santa 5y ago

I think the decision to put it up on OF was pretty deliberate. A story about a museum opening an OnlyFans account is going to get alot more people talking than if the museum did it with the Fediverse or some other implementation.