5 ms·
Obvious retaliation on apple’s part. Unfortunately that’s employment at will. Unions might be an answer but that’s a whole set of trade offs.
by N_A_T_E 5y ago
Obvious retaliation on apple’s part. Unfortunately that’s employment at will. Unions might be an answer but that’s a whole set of trade offs.
- sofixa 5y agoYou don't need full blown unions to have some pretty basic employee protections and rights. They'd help fight for, and protect abuses of said rights, but aren't necessary.
- matt123456789 5y agoPerhaps, but what evidence leads you to that conclusion? The only facts that the article mentions are that she was fired for what Apple claims is the destruction of evidence related to an ongoing investigation, and what coworkers say is organizing a group to discuss internal issues. Seems like he-said/she-said right now, not “obvious retaliation”. Further evidence welcome.