3 ms·

>Not totally sure, but... This kind of discourse is annoying. You don't get "points" for making some hypothetical claim. If you think there is something wron

>Not totally sure, but... This kind of discourse is annoying. You don't get "points" for making some hypothetical claim. If you think there is something wrong with an analysis, demonstrate it. Isn't that what "pro-science" people do?

jaybz000 5y ago
And therein lies the problem with online polling. The randomness, or lack thereof, is not demonstrable without polling people who did not respond to the poll, via a different medium. Hence the standard disclaimer.