3 ms·
You speak of "teams" in a way that implies there are two sides equally unbased, equally mindlessly driven just by team mentality. In this misguided rhetoric, y
by SkeuomorphicBee 5y ago
You speak of "teams" in a way that implies there are two sides equally unbased, equally
mindlessly driven just by team mentality. In this misguided rhetoric, you equate all the scientists
driven by data at one side, with the snake oil salesmen driven by whatever
on the other; as if both sides were equally wrong for defending their position. The thing is,
when we didn't know if those drugs worked or not, all scientists were jumping at the chance of
studding them, after all, there is a lot of clout to be have by finding a cure, there were no teams. But after the
results came out and certain drugs have shown to not have a significant effect, then the serious
scientists moved own (or wanted to move on), but formation of the "team snake oil" to go against the data means
that scientists have to keep repeating themselves debunking things that we already know don't work.
- pandaman 5y agoAs they used to say in the USSR: "Our brave scouts thwarted cowardly enemy spies". If you were on the other team then your designation of "data driven scientists" and "snake oil salesmen" had been opposite and you would be as sure in your point of view as you are now.