> Please re-read my parent comment. I just said that it's severely overstating the case. > In any case claiming that Apple is somehow at fault for not adoptin

> Please re-read my parent comment. I just said that it's severely overstating the case. > In any case claiming that Apple is somehow at fault for not adopting Vulkan doesn't make sense. Why not? They could have adopted Mantle instead, for example. It came out a year earlier. Or it could have replaced Metal with Vulkan later (as it is often a reasonable choice to replace your custom solution with the industry's standard). Or it could have chosen to officially support Vulkan alongside it. Apple has lots of money in the bank, and with that, lots of options.