This reminds me how I was noticing similar in Monaco, a constitutional monarchy. My conclusion was that if it had poor people, then it would be seen as an autho

This reminds me how I was noticing similar in Monaco, a constitutional monarchy. My conclusion was that if it had poor people, then it would be seen as an authoritarian despot. But because it does not house poor people or let unhoused stick around outside, it is seen as a wealthy place where anything goes. It just doesn't encounter strife, but if it did it would be seen as authoritarian. Just an interesting inequality about how jurisdictions are perceived.