4 ms·
My G+ is just as active as my Facebook. But here's the kicker: G+ almost always has better content. The only explanations I have for that are that it's mostl
by wccrawford 15y ago
My G+ is just as active as my Facebook. But here's the kicker:
G+ almost always has better content.
The only explanations I have for that are that it's mostly techie people on there and the bar for posting something is a little higher than Facebook. I don't see people whining that WoW is down, but instead that they found some new scientific breakthrough in the news.
- smackfu 15y agoTechie people post tech news on a site used by early tech adopters. Not sure how you build that out to the general public.
- bh42222 15y agoPardon the old guy complaint, but the general public always seems to eventually take over the tech sites I visit. I'm not sure you have to do anything to make this slow takeover happen. It seems like very interesting content from (and for) a small audience, draws a slightly larger audience, and they bring slightly more popular but also slightly less interesting content, and repeat until you have the reddit front page as it is today.
- uris 15y agoWell, is he really using G+ himself or is his stream empty because he never posts anything? Anyways, I'm a tech guy, but also into photography (http://plus.google.com/104936988539783595605 http://plus.google.com/104936988539783595605), and I must say G+ keeps me plenty busy, more then I've ever been on Facebook, where I sometimes cross post to, roughly, the same audience (non of my family members though are on G+ just yet). Actually, I like G+ for being useful, easy to use, and I give Google credit for listening and quickly adapting and evolving.
- foobarbazetc 15y agoMy G+ stream has at most one post every week. My Facebook stream has about 50-100 posts a week. So I don't know if we just cancelled each other out. But to me, G+ is pretty much dead.