That is not the issue here, a range of different types of hostility were catalogued. Some are I'd say excessively hostile but essentially just dissenting opinio

That is not the issue here, a range of different types of hostility were catalogued. Some are I'd say excessively hostile but essentially just dissenting opinion. I don't see anything in the article or opinion here suggesting that sort of speech should be suppressed or interfered with. Do you? Others were explicit death threats or persistent personal harassment. I think we can agree those are a potentially criminal matter, right?