7 ms·
It's a correlation with poverty and gangs. If you take out gang on gang and suicide, assumung neither is relevant to you, it's true that the numbers become much
by jimmaswell 5y ago
It's a correlation with poverty and gangs. If you take out gang on gang and suicide, assumung neither is relevant to you, it's true that the numbers become much better.
- op00to 5y agoDo these people deserve to die?
- jimmaswell 5y agoIf you join a gang you know what you're signing up for, and I find it hard to argue that an individual doesn't have the right to end their own life.
- op00to 5y agoOK. So just to get your point straight, you believe that we should remove all "illegal use of firearms" from violence and murder statistics so we reflect the harm and damage to people that you deem to be worthy of life? Is there ever collateral damage from a breadwinner, say, getting gunned down? Does that mean that gangster's children don't deserve life at all? Is there something special about their bloodline that makes you more likely to discount their life altogether? Let's get down to brass tacks.