3 ms·

> Nomad seems much simpler to use and manage Agree, Nomad is so easy to get started and because of the simplicity of the architecture, very easy to maintain as

> Nomad seems much simpler to use and manage Agree, Nomad is so easy to get started and because of the simplicity of the architecture, very easy to maintain as well. > but Kubernetes allows you to do more ... We use Kubernetes instead of Nomad at work Same here, Kubernetes at work, Nomad for personal projects. But I have yet to find anything I cannot do in Nomad that you normally do in Kubernetes. Could you provide some specific things you've tried to get working in Nomad but couldn't (or simply doesn't exists in Nomad), while it worked in Kubernetes? Would be useful to know before I get too deep into Nomad.

proxysna 5y ago
> But I have yet to find anything I cannot do in Nomad that you normally do in Kubernetes. VM live migration. I was surprised that people use kubevirt for that, but apparently this is a valid usecase. Otherwise nomad can do relatively complex vm configurations.
candiddevmike 5y ago
The entire operator paradigm is kubernetes centric. You're missing out on all of the innovations around operations automation if you use nomad. Same with GitOps to an extent, HC pushes people to use terraform or waypoint for deployments while everyone else uses argo and tekton (or some other k8s runner).