I found it rather funny. I see some very uncharitable interpretations here. To me it sounded quite a bit like how people tend to implement microservices. It is

I found it rather funny. I see some very uncharitable interpretations here. To me it sounded quite a bit like how people tend to implement microservices. It is a problem our field that people use words so very loosely that it is kind of impossible to know what they are talking about. It is in this forum commonly made fun of that people who tried something and then get told that they didn't do it right. However, this can be a reasonable objection, depending on the circumstances. There are lots of people all over the world doing things in not-so-very-handy ways and thereby causing problems. If A does not work it might be that A should not be applied in your circumstances, it might be that A was applied wrong or it might be that people are falsely assuming that they have a right to a life without problems. Any of these three could be going on when A is not working. the article is making the point that the second case can go quite far.