4 ms·
This is your personal choice, but you've to contextualize this in a larger framework which for most people is society. So if there are lets say, 90% good drive
by ausudhz 5y ago
This is your personal choice, but you've to contextualize this in a larger framework which for most people is society.
So if there are lets say, 90% good driver and 10% of bad drivers, if you are happy to pay less (and you belong to the 90%) then you'd have a 10% people that either pay a lot for their insurance or don't pay it at all because it become too expensive.
So lets say out of the 10% drivers that have a bad behavior, 50% of them (thus 5% or the total) go out without insurance.
Now, it you are, for some reason, unlucky enough to meet one of the 5% without insurance and, unfortunately, you are on a car accident with one of them and that person run away without giving you a chance to ask for damage and, even if you can, he has nothing to repay off this damage, would you be happy?
- fastball 5y agoCar insurance is required in Texas, so your hypothetical is somewhat nonsensical. If it's not required where you are from, maybe you should worry more about fixing that first?
- ausudhz 5y agoIt's required, but doesn't mean that there aren't people who do go on the roads without one. Is hard to enforce the law to 100% of the population. From where I'm from, the number of people driving without insurance has increased for various factors in the last few years. From a 0.x to a 1.x %