3 ms·
No, he’s implying that an infinite series doesn’t have to be infinite in both directions to be infinite.
by nxmnxm99 5y ago
No, he’s implying that an infinite series doesn’t have to be infinite in both directions to be infinite.
- 1e-9 5y ago>...doesn’t have to be... That argues that there might be a first. To be clear, I’m not saying there isn’t a first. I’m just saying this particular argument doesn’t support the assertion.