2 ms·
I am pretty certain that subjects treated for paranoid schizophrenia would disagree with you (or probably mostly their doctors). I think you’re missing the mai
by heavenlyblue 5y ago
I am pretty certain that subjects treated for paranoid schizophrenia would disagree with you (or probably mostly their doctors).
I think you’re missing the main point of my message that if you accept minds are alien to each other then you can’t possibly give any suggestions on whether it’s good or bad to affect one’s mind.
Your “deeply irresponsible” is equally invalid in your point of view as my point. But frankly I deeply disagree with it. If our minds were that different our education system would never work for example, or sports coaches would never be able to train other people. People are variant, but their variation is finite.
- trutannus 5y agoIn that respect you are correct. I thought I had specified in the comment, but it appears I deleted it by mistake while editing. I was specifically talking about people who are not unwell in some way. I was replying to a comment specifically poking another to justify their lack of desire to try this "technology" out. My point should be taken as "nobody needs to explain to you why they don't want to try your 'psychotechnology', you're not visibly an expert in this, nor is this author". This is more a case of someone on the street offering you a powered substance, as opposed to case, a pharmacist handing you tablets from Pfizer.