3 ms·
I don't. I am happy to hear how it could be done if you want offer up any plausible scenario. To sway any election its needs to be done a couple thousand times
by bruceb 5y ago
I don't. I am happy to hear how it could be done if you want offer up any plausible scenario.
To sway any election its needs to be done a couple thousand times at least. How exactly would that work? How many people could you recruit to do it and nobody says anything? How much would be paid per ballot cast?
- post_from_work 5y agoWe could start by asking this guy: https://apnews.com/article/business-california-95b6935d64ab60da519e2296d46df99a https://apnews.com/article/business-california-95b6935d64ab6...
- klyrs 5y agoGot caught, didn't tamper with the ballots, ballots were re-sent. Also, mail-in ballots don't have ID requirements. Nothingburger.
- BitwiseFool 5y agoElection fraud Chicago style: Illinois’ decades-old notoriety for election corruption is legendary https://www.salon.com/2016/02/14/election_fraud_chicago_style_illinois_decades_old_notoriety_for_election_corruption_is_legendary/ https://www.salon.com/2016/02/14/election_fraud_chicago_styl... I posted this elsewhere in the replies but it seems like an open secret. It seems like once the corruption reaches a critical mass, "the system" is no longer interested in thoroughly following up with fraud allegations. It stands to reason that once the politicians who are willing to commit fraud get elected, they appoint people to key positions that are in-debt to the political machine. Prosecutors have to decide whether or not to pursue an investigation. Judges can dismiss a fraud lawsuit for lack of merit or standing. I'm sure there are plenty of other ways to dismiss efforts to actually cut down on corruption, but I just wanted to name a few.