It's clearly a non-starter to suggest that only 1 party would do such a thing, but that's distinct from saying only one "group" would do it if by group we're ta

It's clearly a non-starter to suggest that only 1 party would do such a thing, but that's distinct from saying only one "group" would do it if by group we're talking about social philosophy built around, say, the idea that there must be an in-group that the law protects but does not bind and the idea that there must be an out-group that the law binds but does not protect.